September 3, 2010 - 5:55 pm
This is a documentary for Atheists, people that love Science & love Biology and everybody. The Case for a Creator is a documentary that takes God Yahweh Jesus Christ and the belief in God Yahweh Jesus Christ to physical science and physical biology. This documentary covers Primordial Soup, Evolution AntiChrist Darwinism and Outer Space. This documentary is deep and may fly over your head at how it goes to the Cell Nucleus and Laws of Physics that involve the visible and invisible. In the BONUS FEATURES on the DVD there is Questions and Answers within that there is 11-12 & 13-14 in which some of the things said there and in the PLAY PROGRAM will surprise Atheists and others about God Yahweh Jesus Christ and Evolution AntiChrist Darwinism. The Holy Bible’s verses in Colossians 1:16 & 17 says: For by Him were ALL things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: ALL things were created by
Help with art Homework……………………?
My art teacher gave us an assignment and we have to find the answers to all the questions. She said we were able to use any resources (Technically yahoo answers is one) If you know the answers to any of them please tell me, it doesn’t have to be all of themTYVM
Here are the questions:1.Controversial,graffiti Creators Graffiti Artists artist friend of Warhol’s2.Cartoon-like artworks3.AdHd scientist,mathematician,artist,inventor,poet4.Plaster “ghosts” of people5.Waterlilies6.Painted scenes of southwest us (an artist)7.Artwork consisted of line symbols8.Dream or nightmare scapes9.Cubist(an artist)10.Created pointillism11.Greatest marble sculptor of all time12.Surrealist and creator of “Limp watch picture “Persistence of Memory”13.Super-realistic sculptures of people14.Printed coco-cola bottles and Cambell’s soup cans15.Perhaps the greatest fresco muralist of history._______________No idea if this should be in homework or visual arts section.
Powered by Yahoo! AnswersWatch the video related to Creators Graffiti Artists
Creators Graffiti Artists
Related External Links
Tags: American Catholic, Atheists, Belief In God, Bonus Features, Cell Nucleus, Colossians 1, Creators, Darwinism, Deep Space Nine, Documentary, Dominions, Graffiti Artists, Holy Bible, Jesus Christ, Laws Of Physics, Links Disney, Outer Space, Physical Biology, Physical Science, Planet Earth, Primordial Soup, Principalities, Questions And Answers, Science Portal, Social Darwinism, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, Timelapse, Warm Humor, Yahweh Posted Graffiti Drawings |
Top Sources on Airbrush Graffiti T Shirt
Free Supportive Info on Graffiti Lightning Bolts
Graffiti Word Art Headline News
Hip Hop Graffiti T-shirts Route
Free Useful Roadmap for Authentic Louis Vuitton Graffiti Bag
Beneficial Guide on Urban Graffiti Belt Buckles
The Best Website on Graffiti T Shirt
Top Picks on Ebay for Lamb Graffiti Handbags
Free Useful Guide on Graffiti Shirts Clothing
Free Inviting Info on Graffiti Shirts Com
Accommodating Article on Coach Tattersall Graffiti Wallet
Free Useful Roadmap for Graffiti Shirt Toronto
Free Connected Guideline for Graffiti Bags to Buy
Free Supportive Tips on Coach Tattersall Graffiti Handbags
Related Knowledge on Graffiti Hats Cleveland Ohio
Graffiti Shirts Boys Truths
Assess About Graffiti Hats And Shirts
Graffiti Caps Tips And More!
Free Efficient Guideline for Tutorial Graffiti
September 3rd, 2010 at 7:48 pm
I was curious to see some scientific evidence of a creator, but all I saw were well-spoken people twisting facts to fit their theory.
Irreducible complexity is not a ground-breaking discovery… biology is full of complex mechanisms that need all their parts to function. My eye can’t function without its lens, but there are more primitive eyes that work without one. The “motor” of a flagellum wouldn’t work minus one of its components, but it most likely came from a more primitive organ that served a more primitive purpose. Just like my eye.
If I take a cell and smash it to bits, no one can expect to be able to reassemble it into a living cell, just as no one can expect to turn a bunch of smashed human body parts into a living person. Come on people.
September 4th, 2010 at 7:08 am
The conversion of someone from an dogmatically entrenched point of view to a radically new one is always interesting. This is what you’ll find in the DVD and book.
Lee Stobel’s search for the truth on evolution that he dearly embraced for so many decades is captured in this autobiography. His testimonial statement on exactly where he was and what seat in the science lab where he absorbed and committed to the teaching about evolution shows the impact that science classes have on nearly all youth. Lee’s academic and acclaimed professional accomplishments in journalism prepared him to seek the truth. His progressive search resulted in a recanting of evolution from the withering of facts that evolution had falsely propported. The overwhelming discoveries of science that extend from microbiology to astrophysics drew him closer to the conclusion of intelligent design. The other academic and scientific contributors and their explainations of intelligent design pose the same positive approach to seeking academic freedom and thought of all the evidence available for scientific scrutiny. Closed and open minded watchers will be perplexed at the stale debate for evolution. Intelligent design wins.
September 4th, 2010 at 7:12 pm
Just like all the followers of the intelligent design theory, who try to search for the presence of God through science; Lee Strobel takes the same approach through a series of interviews with his guests. As the skeptic that Lee Strobel trys to present himself, I assumed that he would interview experts on both sides and compare their observations, but he sticks to “experts” who mostly are Christians and strongly disagree with Darwin’s theory. This alone made me admire the other documentary “Expelled: No Intelligence allowed” simply for the fact that those with opposing claims were interviewed.
The statement that man had evolved from monkeys; is not a correct interpretation of Darwin’s ideas. Darwin’s claim is that both modern monkeys and man evolved from a common primate ancestor. Not that I agree or disagree, but here we need to study the details of Darwin’s theory before we start to discredit it. This is the minimal requirement for a scholar in the search for truth. I tried to be patient and watch all discussions, and thank “the creator” that the document ended. I still can’t get over the discussion of the Evidence of Consciousness and how evolution can’t explain consciousness or free will. Please keep in mind that consciousness is a relatively new research area and proving or disproving of evolution doesn’t mean an intelligent designer is the only answer. If we want to discuss science, the least we can do is provide scientific evidence to substantiate our claim. The lack of evidence doesn’t prove much. I guess that’s why faith is called faith; you simply can’t create enough scientific evidence to make people believe in God.
Even though the arguments simply address the claim that a creator of some sort must exist, but after investigating Mr. Strobel’s other work the viewer can safely conclude that the creator that Mr. Strobel is referring to is a Christian God. Man, all other humans who believe in a creator (not a certain religion) are doomed now:( At least we should be very thankful for Mrs. Strobel’s conversion to Christianity that enabled this work of rare genius.
I try not to judge based on looks, so I watched the entire DVD and concluded that Mr. Strobel is not smarter than he looks. Don’t take my word for it, and watch for yourself. It is interesting to see how people with different logic than us operate. Very interesting!
September 5th, 2010 at 7:47 am
Very convincing case you make Mr. Strobel! And although I’m certainly a layperson (like most if not all of us reviewers here are), I liked your scientific approach to explaining a complex issue that most others don’t view scientifically. While viewing for the first time, I did have some expectation that you would mention others’ work such as Simcha Jacobovici (eg, The Exodus Decoded), but this wasn’t the case.
Anyway, the only major “leap” that I’m inclined to find fault with was your (Stobel’s) tendency to use “creator” and “God” interchangeably. “Creator” and “God” (or a “god”) really isn’t the same thing. Although “God” may be how WE view a creator through our own eyes, a creator may not view him/herself as a god. Perhaps one more segment in your documentary would have been sufficient to address this last issue, I guess for those looking for a god instead of just a creator.
September 5th, 2010 at 7:04 pm
Love this book. I now have to learn to put the book into practice in my life.
September 6th, 2010 at 7:07 am
With reverence, at the very least! I came to this book after the author’s 4 Agreements and found the prayers and guided meditations here very effective as I learned meditation and began to deepen my spiritual practice. It doesn’t matter which denomination or religion you claim to belong to, because these truthful, poetic insights and encouragements transcend labels and unnatural boundaries. It is as if Ruiz discovered a coven of saintly horses who taught him these golden words. Read and recite these prayers and meditations like that, like you’re reading and reciting poetry, and you will feel it, yes. You will feel transformed as your skin tingles, as all of your senses awaken to the wonderful world we share!
–Robert McDowell, author of the forthcoming Poetry In Spiritual Practice
September 6th, 2010 at 7:42 pm
A must-have for anyone wanting short, simple writings that pack a lot of peace & clarity. A simply amazing book!!
September 7th, 2010 at 7:30 am
This book is all about let bygones be bygones and moving on with life. If you think life treats you unfair, then it’s up to you to change. It teaches how to pray and forgive.
September 7th, 2010 at 7:44 pm
A follow up to Paul Johnson’s momentous work, Intellectuals, in which Johnson pointed out the hypocrisy and moral degeneration of the those who claim to be the great custodians of human justice and morality, an ‘intellectual’ is according to Johnson’s definition someone who believes that ideas are more important than people.
In this highly readable and interesting volume, Johnson traces the lives and works of writers, architects, writers and designers. We learn of their lives and the ins and outs of their work.
In his introduction, Johnson refers to the Ancient Egyptian, Imhotep ((2650-2600 BCE), believed to be the first stone architect. Johnson takes us through the linguistic skill and alliterations of Chaucer, and examines two characters of Shakespeare’s Falstaff and Hamlet.
He informs us how Victor Hugo was motivated to write Les Miserables, on the injustices he believed himself to have suffered despite his own callous disregard for the women he used and discarded.
He compares Hugo to Dickens, who unlike Hugo was true humanitarian and philanthropist. While Hugo thundered about injustice in general, dickens worked in specific instances to remedy it.
In his chapter on the great designers of the 20th century, Christian Dior and Cristobal Balenciaga he describes the motivations of those who shaped beauty and elegance . He describes the 1960 as ‘that disastrous decade’. Lastly he compares Pablo Picasso, revered by the av ant garde left, to be a brutal and sadistic egomaniac who beat women unconscious and supported the worst excesses of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union, Spain and elsewhere.
By contrast Walt Disney rejected Leftist ideals, struggled against those artists who aimed to turn cinema into a Marxist political tool and as a result was and still is demonized by the left wing thoughts and ideas establishment
A lively testimony of those who create and are inspired, and their lives and characters. A good read.
September 8th, 2010 at 7:10 am
I like paul johnson, and this book is a nice survey on an interesting array of figures. He provides cute anecdotes and primary traits that are found in different creators. Its an easy read, that will give you interesting but forgetful facts. I recommend it, but I recommend it be digested in sips, not in gulps.
September 8th, 2010 at 7:48 pm
I have thoroughly enjoyed reading this book. The first chapter, on Chaucer, was brilliant and illuminating; the details of his life here were not mentioned when I was in college, and the analysis of his genius made me want to go back and look at “The Canterbury Tales” all over again. And this is where the “dangerous” part comes in: I wound up ordering the original Middle English for my Kindle, and a good translation in paperback.
The next chapter, on Albrecht Durer, was equally fascinating, and I wound up ordering a couple books of Durer’s drawings and woodcuts! More danger!
I survived the chapter on Shakespeare undamaged, since I already have everything Shakespeare wrote.
But the fascination (and the “danger”) go on and on. I have so far resisted the idea of ordering any more of Bach’s music, but I do want to investigate the work of a man named Pugin, whom I had never heard of before. Jane Austen and George Eliot deserve a more thorough review, and so on.
So I am reminded of a term I heard from the book-trade: “Mrs. X is one of the best hand-sellers in the business.” What’s a “hand-seller?” Well, this is basically a person who reads widely and loves books, and will engage customers in conversation, dropping in things like, “Oh, so you like Dickens, do you? Have you ever read anything by Trollope?” And she puts a copy of “The Warden” in your hand. “Oh, you follow the career of Freud, do you? Have you read this latest book?” — and another book is plopped into your hand. When you finally reach the check-out counter, you may be holding four or five books you had not even contemplated buying, but are now eager to read.
Paul Johnson’s “Creators” is just such an experience, but I’m pretty sure that he gets no commission from his excellent work!!
September 9th, 2010 at 7:28 am
Really tedious. A few good chapters, but on the whole, it’s not about creative courage, it’s about what Johnson happens to like about particular people. So the reader doesn’t learn as much about whomever as one might hope.